The Onion: Right Again?

The day after Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, the Onion ran this short piece: “Black Man Given Nation’s Worst Job.”

05 November 2008 / WASHINGTON—African-American man Barack Obama, 47, was given the least-desirable job in the entire country Tuesday when he was elected president of the United States of America. In his new high-stress, low-reward position, Obama will be charged with such tasks as completely overhauling the nation’s broken-down economy, repairing the crumbling infrastructure, and generally having to please more than 300 million Americans and cater to their every whim on a daily basis. As part of his duties, the black man will have to spend four to eight years cleaning up the messes other people left behind. The job comes with such intense scrutiny and so certain a guarantee of failure that only one other person even bothered applying for it. Said scholar and activist Mark L. Denton, “It just goes to show you that, in this country, a black man still can’t catch a break.”

Who could have imagined one of the “messes that other people left behind” would be the month and half long (and sure to be longer) oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico? Last week Maureen Dowd summed up Obama’s biographical trajectory since his magical election in 2008 (“A Storyteller Loses the Story Line“). “It’s not a good narrative arc,” she wrote: “The man who walked on water is now ensnared by a crisis under water.” A little further along in her column,  citing the post-election piece from the Onion above, Dowd opines:

The oil won’t stop flowing, but the magic has. Barack Obama is a guy who is accustomed to having stuff go right for him. He’s gotten a lot of breaks: two opponents in his U.S. Senate race in Illinois felled by personal scandals; a mismanaged presidential campaign by Hillary Clinton; an economic collapse that set the stage for a historic win, memorably described by the satiric Onion newspaper as “Black Man Given Nation’s Worst Job.”

A lot of people voted for Obama because they thought he could somehow rise above the exigencies and disasters that continually befall a nation of nearly 310,000,000 people. His rhetorical flair as a senator and presidential candidate was convincing. He promised to bring change to Washington and the business-as-usual rigmarole that many have grown desperately tired of. It’s tough to measure change in a presidency in the midst of its unfolding, to be sure. The medical reform bill has been a big change, yes, and straight out of the gate Obama snagged the Nobel Peace Prize. That was a quick change in the tenor of global opinion on the U.S. government. But here, on the ground, we still have Guantanamo, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran in more or less the same ways we had them under the Bush administration. As Obama faces what will likely be the largest environmental disaster of his presidency, how different has he come across to the U.S. citizenry than did George W. Bush in the wake of Hurricane Katrina? While many in the the media are asking why Obama is not more visibly upset or vocally empathic with the people of the Gulf Region, I am reminded of questions put to Bush’s press secretary about why he was absent for days after the floods overtook New Orleans. Should we expect more from Obama than we did from Bush? In his run up to the White House, did Bush instill hope for change in people the same way Obama did during his campaign? Can Obama, as Dowd presses him in her column last week, seize his story line and reshape its current characterization of himself of a passive, detached, acquiescent man and rise to the heights of his one-time soaring rhetoric of change and progress and hope? Right now he seems too meek.

Advertisements

One thought on “The Onion: Right Again?

  1. wildbillyscircusstory

    Sigh. The Onion only got it half right: it’s the WORLD’s worst job. I’ve been critical of the President at times and often opposed his agenda. But Mo-Do needs to reign it in and give the guy a break. The first year is always the hardest for a President, even those who ride a landslide into office. Add to the mixture a gentleman who has virtually no executive experience and it’s bound to compound his woes. This partially explains the preference of Americans for former Governors (Clinton, Bush II, Carter, FDR) Vice-Presidents (Bush I, Nixon) and Generals (Eisenhower) to fill the job; they can assess the candidate’s performance in an executive role. While representatives and senators fill important functions they haven’t sat behind the desk where the “buck” stops. And even those that have significant executive experience find a steep learning curve when they arrive at 1600 Pennsylvania.

    That said, I rolled my eyes when reading Mo-Do’s enumeration of all the “breaks” President Obama received in his career trajectory. Not so long ago she excorciated anyone who said such things and tarred them as folks who couldn’t tolerate the idea of a black President. There were lots of folks who drank the Obama Kool-Aid and figured he’d sweep into town and change everything for the better based upon the sheer force of his personality. Conservatives exhibited the same naivite in 1980 and 1984. I don’t think she has buyer’s remorse, but maybe she is embarrassed by her own significant contributions to the President’s “walk on water” personae.

    The BP oil spill is a perfect example of why the Presidency is the worst job in the world: Presidents get blamed for everything. Has his response been sub-par? Perhaps. But what could he have done differently other than grant Gov. Jindal a waiver on EPA regulations for the construction of sand bars to keep the oil off shore? It is fundamentally unfair to expect a President to predict the unprecedented (Katrina, BP) or be able to snap his fingers and instantly solve the catastrophe.

    Last night’s woeful address notwithstanding (hey – even Olbermann said it stunk), I’m fully behind our President on this. He may have acted too slowly for Mo-Do, but she has the luxury of being wrong and simply moving on to her next column; President Obama can’t indulge fantasies – he must be realistic. His response must be measured and precise – the fate of an entire region and multiple countries depends on him. In the face of the greatest environmental catastrophe since Chernobyl, if I can stand behind our President, I think maybe she can give her guy the benefit of the doubt that he’ll get it right.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s